In a recent groundbreaking move, the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has announced that it will no longer be setting a national cut-off mark for the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME). Instead, individual universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education across Nigeria will now be responsible for determining their own cut-off marks for admission into various courses. This change, which marks a significant departure from past practices, has left many stakeholders in the Nigerian education sector—students, parents, educational institutions, and policymakers—curious about what this means for the future of university admissions.
For years, JAMB had been setting a fixed cut-off mark for all institutions, which was used as a benchmark for assessing candidates’ eligibility for admission into higher education. While this system was generally effective in creating a unified standard across the country, it often left many educational institutions feeling constrained by a one-size-fits-all approach. The decision to decentralize the setting of cut-off marks comes as a response to growing calls for more autonomy for universities, polytechnics, and other tertiary institutions in the admission process.
This new policy will give institutions the flexibility to set their own cut-off marks based on factors such as the number of candidates that apply, the quality of students they wish to admit, and their specific academic programs. It is anticipated that this will lead to a more tailored approach to admissions, allowing institutions to maintain high academic standards while accommodating the diverse needs of students.
Implications of the New Policy
- Institutional Autonomy in Admission Processes
Under the new directive, institutions will have the authority to set their cut-off marks, allowing them to align the marks with their academic standards and available resources. This means that universities can establish a cut-off mark that reflects the level of competition and the calibre of students they are willing to admit. For example, highly competitive programs, such as medicine or law, may set higher cut-off marks, while other programs might have lower marks depending on the demand for those courses. - Increased Competition Among Universities
With the ability to set their own cut-off marks, universities may adopt different strategies to attract the best students. Some might lower their cut-off marks to increase their intake, while others could raise the thresholds to ensure they admit the top-performing students. This could lead to a shift in the competitive landscape, where top universities might maintain or increase their marks to preserve their reputation, and others may adopt more inclusive policies. - Impact on Prospective Students
For prospective students, the change means that they will need to stay informed about the specific cut-off marks set by the institutions they are interested in. This adds an extra layer of complexity to the application process, as students will now have to research the cut-off marks for multiple schools and programs. Additionally, it may lead to more strategic decision-making, with students considering a wider range of institutions and adjusting their expectations based on the cut-off requirements. - Potential for Regional Disparities
One concern about this change is the possibility of disparities in the cut-off marks between regions or types of institutions. While more prestigious universities in urban centers may set higher cut-off marks, institutions in rural or underserved areas may have lower marks to attract a larger pool of candidates. This could exacerbate existing inequalities in access to higher education, as students from less competitive backgrounds might find it harder to gain admission to more sought-after universities.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the reason behind JAMB’s decision to stop setting UTME cut-off marks?
JAMB’s decision to stop setting a national cut-off mark for UTME is driven by the desire to give individual institutions more autonomy in the admission process. By allowing universities and other tertiary institutions to set their own cut-off marks, it is believed that they will have greater flexibility in selecting candidates who meet their academic standards, thus tailoring admissions to the specific needs of each institution.
How will this change affect university admissions?
The change will allow universities to determine their own cut-off marks based on factors such as program demand, resources, and the quality of candidates they wish to admit. It is expected to make the admission process more flexible and responsive to the unique needs of each institution, potentially improving the quality of admitted students and reducing administrative bottlenecks.
Will students still be required to meet a minimum mark to be eligible for admission?
Yes, although JAMB will no longer set a national cut-off mark, each university will still establish its own minimum score for admission. Students will need to meet the cut-off mark set by the institution they are applying to in order to be considered for admission into their desired program.
Could this lead to unfair advantages for certain schools?
There is a possibility that the new policy could lead to disparities between institutions, with some schools setting lower cut-off marks to increase their intake while others maintain high standards. However, this move is meant to allow institutions to better reflect their academic capacity and the competition within specific fields of study. It remains to be seen how this will play out in terms of fairness across the entire higher education system.
Also Read: NDA Admission, Courses Requirements & Subject Combinations